-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 803
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade package @mui/x-date-pickers #2326
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-214
: Summary of package.json changesThe changes in this file are minimal and focused:
- Addition of
@mui/base
dependency (requires clarification).- Upgrade of
@mui/x-date-pickers
to version 7.18.0 (aligns with PR objectives).These changes appear to be isolated and shouldn't affect other parts of the project configuration. However, please ensure that:
- The application has been thoroughly tested with these changes.
- The changelog for
@mui/x-date-pickers
has been reviewed for any breaking changes or new features that might affect the project.- The addition of
@mui/base
is justified and necessary for the project.Consider updating the project documentation to reflect these dependency changes, especially if
@mui/base
introduces new features or patterns to the project.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
15-15
: Clarify the addition of "@mui/base" dependency.A new dependency
"@mui/base": "^5.0.0-beta.58"
has been added. This addition was not mentioned in the PR objectives and requires explanation:
- Why was this dependency added?
- How does it relate to the PR's main objective of upgrading
@mui/x-date-pickers
?- Are there any potential compatibility issues with other dependencies?
- Have you tested the application thoroughly with this new beta dependency?
Please provide more context on this addition and confirm that it has been properly tested.
22-22
: Approved: Version upgrade of @mui/x-date-pickersThe upgrade of
@mui/x-date-pickers
to version^7.18.0
aligns with the PR objectives. This minor version upgrade should maintain backwards compatibility.However, there's a slight discrepancy in the reported initial version:
- PR objectives mention upgrading from 7.12.1
- AI summary mentions upgrading from 7.11.1
- The actual upgrade is to 7.18.0
Could you please clarify the exact initial version of
@mui/x-date-pickers
before this upgrade? This will help in accurately documenting the change.
Please fix the failing tests |
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
Closing inactivity |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Upgrades package @mui/x-date-pickers from 7.12.1 to 7.18.0
Issue Number:
issue #2295
Did you add tests for your changes?
N/A
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
Upgrades @mui/x-date-pickers to newer version.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
N/A
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
@mui/base
, enhancing UI components.Updates
@mui/x-date-pickers
, improving date picker functionality.